duxrule

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 647 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: H. R. Hadelman indicted. #32719

    duxrule
    Participant

    This has been bugging me for days; it’s Haldeman, not Hadelman. 😉


    duxrule
    Participant

    Looks to me like you started it, Bacon. To that end, when is is “proper” to politicize events like this? You say that we can’t do it now, the topic goes away, and we have another mass shooting two weeks later. This IS the time to politicize this. American citizens are being deprived of their lives, their liberty and their pursuit of happiness. More than 22,000 people thought they were going out for a good time last night, until some gunaholic decided to act out. It’s actually a Constitutional crisis, and the discussion needs to be front and center.

    in reply to: Twitter needs to ban @RealDonaldChump #32001

    duxrule
    Participant

    Too bad that Dubya didn’t do it when he has his chance, rather than invading a country that didn’t attack us.

    in reply to: A prediction for Sunday, 9/24 #32000

    duxrule
    Participant

    “I don’t bring up what Clinton did anymore except to demonstrate why we can support Trump in spite of a personal failing, since the opposition did the same thing, and IMHO for something much worse.”

    Clinton didn’t collude with our enemies to get himself elected.

    in reply to: A prediction for Sunday, 9/24 #31999

    duxrule
    Participant

    “But know that the majority of us voted against crooked Hillary.”

    Untrue. Quit with the Alternative Facts.

    in reply to: Harvey rescuers now face deportation #31689

    duxrule
    Participant

    “But why waste an opportunity to vilify “45”?”

    Each and every fucking day. We have a crook, a con man and an actual criminal in the White House. The clarion call about this charlatan needs to be sounded 24-7.

    in reply to: The Eclipse #31468

    duxrule
    Participant

    I wasn’t prepared for what I saw at totality. I’d seen several annular eclipses, but I was absolutely gobsmacked when I pulled my glasses down. People at work had the same “meh” reaction at the partial eclipse, but that’s because they didn’t get to see the whole show. I’m also thinking about plans for 2024. 😉

    in reply to: Trump Jr. "scandal" will have no impact. #30640

    duxrule
    Participant

    Does this guy not own any clothes? A sunken chest with spindly body hair does little to assist with the attention span.

    in reply to: Collusion: It's what's for dinner #30593

    duxrule
    Participant

    “I suspect the average guy doesn’t care about this.” Suspect again. Notice that this is from Newsmax.

    Poll: 54 Percent Say Trump Did Something Illegal or Unethical With Russia

    http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/poll-trump-illegal-unethical/2017/07/06/id/800111/

    It’s probably more likely that you Trumprades will need to drop the charade, and admit that you got suckered.

    in reply to: Trump Jr. "scandal" will have no impact. #30591

    duxrule
    Participant

    Watch the house of cards collapse as the indictments start coming in. This is clearly actionable information, and subpoenas are going to start flying soon. Once we get to the point where someone could to jail, they’ll start cutting deals and will sing like birds. These people like power and the perks it provides, but they like staying out of prison even more. Self-preservation will kick in, and any “loyalty” to Il Douche’ will evaporate like acetone left out in the hot sun.

    in reply to: Collusion: It's what's for dinner #30575

    duxrule
    Participant

    “He’s an experienced renowned attorney and doesn’t see this as any different than journalists using information that was illegally obtained.”

    No, he’s not. He’s roundly ridiculed by anyone that’s not on Fox or Breitbart.

    in reply to: Collusion: It's what's for dinner #30538

    duxrule
    Participant

    “No law was broken. There was no “treason.” It’s not illegal to talk to a Russian attorney. It’s not illegal to accept help from a Russian attorney.”

    Except that Il Douche’ II and the rest of the campaign have been denying that ANY meetings took place for months prior to this.
    http://theweek.com/speedreads/711286/watch-donald-trump-jr-vehemently-deny-russian-interest-fathers-campaign-month-after-meeting-kremlin-source

    The only reason that ID2 released these e-mails was to beat the NYT document dump that was coming. If he was lying about this meeting, one can only wonder what else was going on with the Russkies, can’t they? (though the evidence is piling up by the day)


    duxrule
    Participant

    duxrule
    Participant

    You know that we’re going to get to see Trump’s pee tape, don’t you? It’s going to show up. We’ve gone from “never happened” to “oh yeah, it happened, but I don’t remember anything that was said.” You know what comes after that, don’t you. No wonder Il Douche’ says that “we need to move on from Russia,” because the gas on the stove just keeps getting cranked higher.

    in reply to: CNN producer says "Russia Narrative is Bullshit" #30293

    duxrule
    Participant

    “…recorded video/audio from the horses mouth now is unbelievable??? UNBELIEVABLE!!!”

    Not if you’re aware of the “creative editing” that O’Keefe and Project Veritas employs. In today’s electronic world, video is far from being your perfect witness. Images and voices can easily be manipulated, which is what O’Keefe does on a regular basis. Do you wonder why no one from Planned Parenthood has been charged after the PV videos? Because they were proved to be worthless as actual evidence.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 647 total)