June 13, 2015 at 12:25 pm #11564RobPParticipant
And of course the cornerstone of the campaign re-re-relaunch is the socialist view that “real and lasting prosperity must be built by all and shared by all.”
Heaven help us all if she gets elected.June 13, 2015 at 12:31 pm #11565BrianlParticipant
Maybe if the Republicans nominate someone worth a hill of shit, she won’t be elected.June 13, 2015 at 12:38 pm #11567
There isn’t any other way to get to a prosperous state.
Labor is the source of all wealth.
It only makes sense to share the product of it so we have people living reasonable, modest lives in return fo a lot of their time.
Republicans aren’t running anybody looking to improve the state of things for you, unless you are wealthy enough to not need it, in which case they are happy to help you get more.
I hope she wins so we get 8 more years of righties going full bat shit over it all, just like they have with Obama. Perhaps that will be enough time for the worst to age out and we get meaningful progress.June 13, 2015 at 1:55 pm #11570Listener_PeteParticipant
Don’t forget if Hillary wins, she will probably have the opportunity to switch the right leaning supreme court to a left leaning court.June 13, 2015 at 2:47 pm #11572
One justice will matter.June 13, 2015 at 3:49 pm #11573paulwalkerParticipant
I think her “quiet” campaign was seen as not really working, and this is kind of a re-set. More power to her, atleast she has the ability to be open minded about change. Now she needs to start answering more questions from the media. If she wins she will have much more experience in high office than Obama, albeit some of which was not “official” high office.June 13, 2015 at 4:14 pm #11574darth talonParticipant
Well I remember back in 2008 how conservatives kept saying that they would vote for Hillary Clinton because she’s the most conservative candidate for President.
This was after years of bashing and attacking her as First Lady and a Senator. Now they’re back to attacking her. Conservatives, make up you’re mind. Do you hate her or like her?
As a Democrat. I’m not voting for Hillary. The Clinton’s time is over. Her best shot of being President was in 2008. It’s time for the country to move forward. Electing Hillary Clinton (Or Jeb Bush) is a step back wards.June 13, 2015 at 4:26 pm #11575edselehrParticipant
If Jeb would be a redo of the Bush years, and Hillary would be a redo of the Bill Clinton years…Hillary is the only choice.June 13, 2015 at 4:51 pm #11576LangstonParticipant
Carly Fiorina and Lindsey Graham have previously announced.June 13, 2015 at 7:56 pm #11580VitalogyParticipant
What I’ve found is that conservatives afraid of socialism are usually people who could use a little bit of it.
Of all the candidates on both sides, Hillary is clearly superior in all aspects of what you want a President to be. If you’re against her, you’re an ideologue or you have a problem with having a female president.June 14, 2015 at 1:30 am #11588skepticalParticipant
With things coming to a head in the Mid East, who do YOU want in charge of the football?June 14, 2015 at 2:40 pm #11592Chris_TaylorParticipant
I’m turning into a Bernie Sanders fan. He’ll get his butt handed to him and won’t get elected, but, I love his message and the way he’s delivering it.June 14, 2015 at 4:00 pm #11593
Yeah, me too. He’s dishing it out old school and most of the body politic knows it, maybe envies it, but is on the accepted track…
I want him to win because I suspect we would all get a serious 4 year education in civics most of us could use.June 14, 2015 at 7:52 pm #11597VitalogyParticipant
Bernie Sanders is money. However, he’s not electable in a national election. I’d consider voting for him in the primary just to send a message, but at the end of the day, I want to make sure no matter what a D is in the White House in 2016.June 14, 2015 at 8:17 pm #11600
Yeah, me too. I’m absolutely not going to put SCOTUS at risk, and the Bush years still sting!
Hopefully, we all get this right.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.