- This topic has 7 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 6 years, 2 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Do you feel that we’d be better served as a Putocracy as opposed to the Democratic Republic set up by our founding fathers?
We know you’ve already proposed that the poor should be excluded from the democratic process.
I floated the idea more as a thought experiment that those dependent upon the government ought to forfeit ther right to vote, which includes more than the poor, the idea being that it seems unfair that the political process could be so corrupted that one could use it to vote benefits for themselves at the expense of other citizens.
Actually, the people that will be thankful are the advertisers who will suck up a billion dollars in spending.
Hillary will still win and the Senate goes Dem as a result.
And the Cock brothers will have wasted more of their money.
Mott Romney is dependent on government for his obscene and immoral tax liability on $20 million in income per year. 13% Fed rate. I paid AMT of 26% because I work for a living rather than living off a vulture capitalist background.
…those dependent upon the government ought to forfeit ther right to vote…
http://greenpeaceblogs.org/2014/07/30/koch-brothers-dont-like-subsidies-yet-received-plenty-of-them/
http://observer.com/2010/09/7-ways-the-koch-bros-benefit-from-corporate-welfare/
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.