- This topic has 7 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 6 years, 3 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
It’s really pathetic when you ask for talking points before going on the air to review someone’s performance.
But hey, lying and deceptions doesn’t matter to the moronic American electorate…
I’m really interested in your liberal loon comments.
Sure, it is fun to write liars, loons, etc…
I do it all the time. Bat shit in their hair crazy Republicans.
The real question is the support for it. Got any? This forum has years of reasonable commentary serving to support the regular treatment of most Republicans. They are on the right side of history how many times compared to Dems and the likes of Bernie Sanders?
Not many at all.
And what of FOX?
We know the broadcast media sucks. This thing is no surprise. Happens all the time.
Linking it to Liberals in general doesn’t get you anywhere, and it’s due to that whole right side of history problem just mentioned.
Fact is liberals just don’t lie much. Conservatives tend to do it very significantly more and consistently.
Loons?
As mentioned, I’m ready to read your case with great interest.
“lying and deceptions doesn’t matter to the moronic American electorate…”
Um, it’s called partisanship combined with journalistic laziness.
But since the electorate is “moronic” as you claim, who cares? Morons can’t process complex information, so let the pundits do what they do. In fact, why should they work so hard if they are talking to “the moronic American electorate”.
Who are you criticizing here? Begala, or the American people?
But hey, lying and deceptions doesn’t matter to the moronic American electorate…
Does “moronic” extend to the inability to construct a grammatically correct sentence?
It’s really pathetic when you ask for talking points before going on the air to review someone’s performance.Except that not what he did:
Right-Wing Media Seize On Inaccurate New York Times Report To Attack CNN’s Begala
“Right-wing media are seizing on a New York Times report that misleadingly stated that Paul Begala sought “talking points” from the State Department before a CNN appearance to discuss Hillary Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state to attack the CNN contributor as biased. But in the email in question, Begala actually requested a “briefing,” not talking points.”
“Begala actually requested a “briefing,” not talking points.”
What would the difference be other than code for “briefing”.
It is perfect ordinary to get input from somebody, or an entity before publishing something critical.
Unless one is doing fact free propaganda.
Seems to me, those people in the State dept. just might be qualified to offer qualifiers for opinion.
The folks not doing those kinds of basic things are running around yelling, BECAUSE BENGAZI!
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.